<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nick Read &#187; time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickread.co.uk/tag/time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickread.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 13:29:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Time and Tide</title>
		<link>http://www.nickread.co.uk/notebook/2009/12/time-and-tide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nickread.co.uk/notebook/2009/12/time-and-tide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Read</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickread.co.uk/?p=910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time is the measure of things moving.  It’s like history; one bloody thing after another, but if nothing happens there is no time, ho history, nothing.  We know by determining the rate of decay of radioactivity in rocks that the earth came into being 4,558 million years ago.  This sounds a bit like Archbishop Usher, [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nickread.co.uk/articles/2011/07/all-change-please/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: All Change, Please'>All Change, Please</a> <small>Life is a constant process of modification and adaptation,   The...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nickread.co.uk/notebook/2009/12/tempus-fugit/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Tempus fugit.'>Tempus fugit.</a> <small>Time flies, the old man cried, as the alarm clock...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nickread.co.uk/articles/2010/09/chaos-in-the-bowels/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Chaos in the Bowels'>Chaos in the Bowels</a> <small>Jules Henri Poincare (1854 – 1912) was in trouble.  The...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time is the measure of things moving.  It’s like history; one bloody thing after another, but if nothing happens there is no time, ho history, nothing.  We know by determining the rate of decay of radioactivity in rocks that the earth came into being 4,558 million years ago.  This sounds a bit like Archbishop Usher, who calculated that the world was created 4,404 years ago. </p>
<p>Time cannot be thought about with considering space as well.  Time is the fourth dimension.  We only need to go out and look at the night sky to see it happening.   The light that reaches us tonight set out from the nearest star 5 years ago and from the most distant galaxy, many thousand years ago.    </p>
<p>Isaac Newton thought time was always there; a God given fact, space was the constant stage upon which things happened, and light always travelled in straight lines. It was not until Albert Einstein that anyone dared to question these ‘facts’.  Einstein deduced that things that seemed to take place at the same time from an observer on earth, would occur at a different time if you were passing in a rocket. Events are perceived at the speed of light and if we were to pass through space near or at the speed of light, time would slow and stop.  Both time and space are relative to the observer.  Moreover light could ‘bend’.  The sun, 8 light minutes away probably did not exert an attraction on the earth but it warped space so that objects had to move in a fixed trajectory around the sun and light had a trajectory too. But it was Arthur Eddington that came up with the ‘proof’ by studying the light from stars behind a solar eclipse that light could appear to bend around massive objects  Eddington illustrated this by throwing a melon into the middle of a tautly held tablecloth and then rolling a walnut around the depression created.  Eureka!</p>
<p>If things are completely inert and nothing changes, then there is no time.  As soon as things change, there is time. So time and space are a continuum.  The approved wisdom states that time started with The Big Bang some 5000 billion years ago.  Since then matter, galaxies, stars, planets are speeding apart and getting colder and colder.  At one time, it was thought there would be a limit to the expansion and as mass  decelerated, gravitational forces would cause it to start to implode and then time would run backwards.  That’s what the equations would predict.  And how can we begin to understand what caused the big bang originally is it wasn’t some coalescence of mass and energy.  Nevertheless, physicists now seem convinced that there was a big bang and everything sped apart and is still accelerating and must eventually disappear.  Then nothing will change and time will cease again. Part of the evidence of the big bang came from the analysis of interference or white noise on television monitors.  I maybe an old cynic, but in astronomical physics as with everything else, what value evidence?              </p>
<p>So do we move through time or does time move through us?  We may be able to see time past, both in cosmological terms and what is fixed in memory, but we cannot see what is to come.  And there’s a problem, if time passes through us, then everything is preordained.  There is no free will.  To a certain extent that is true.  After the first few years of life, we create for ourselves a template for the way we will react, the choices we are likely to make, how our future is likely to be.  As the Jesuits said, give me the child at 7 years of age and I will show you the man.      </p>
<p>But doesn’t this all depend on the assumptions we make.  How do we know?  Physicists talk confidently about the distance of stars, how far galaxies are away, but how do they know?  Is there any independent measure of this that doesn’t depend on assumptions about time and space?   If space is curved like a doughnut,  could we not be looking at ourselves coming back?   Does Einsteinian geometry predict astronomical observations or does it just explain them?  Just as the design of a camera, the curvature of the lens, the shape of the aperture, determines our perception of the object, so image we have of our universe depends on the instruments by which we observe it, the assumptions of our  computers and the conceptual limits of our frontal cortices. The ancient Egyptians believed that the sun travelled across the sky every day and the moon did the same every night.  How much more satisfying life must have been then.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nickread.co.uk/articles/2011/07/all-change-please/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: All Change, Please'>All Change, Please</a> <small>Life is a constant process of modification and adaptation,   The...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nickread.co.uk/notebook/2009/12/tempus-fugit/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Tempus fugit.'>Tempus fugit.</a> <small>Time flies, the old man cried, as the alarm clock...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nickread.co.uk/articles/2010/09/chaos-in-the-bowels/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Chaos in the Bowels'>Chaos in the Bowels</a> <small>Jules Henri Poincare (1854 – 1912) was in trouble.  The...</small></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nickread.co.uk/notebook/2009/12/time-and-tide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tempus fugit.</title>
		<link>http://www.nickread.co.uk/notebook/2009/12/tempus-fugit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nickread.co.uk/notebook/2009/12/tempus-fugit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Read</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickread.co.uk/?p=907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time flies, the old man cried, as the alarm clock struck him on the back of the head.  For the elderly, time does indeed fly; not just the clock but the days, the weeks, the years.  Time seems to shorten, to press in on itself, as we get older. But for the young, a week [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nickread.co.uk/notebook/2009/12/time-and-tide/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Time and Tide'>Time and Tide</a> <small>Time is the measure of things moving.  It’s like history;...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nickread.co.uk/notebook/2010/04/too-tired-to-remember-easter/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Too tired to remember Easter.'>Too tired to remember Easter.</a> <small>Easter passed me by this year.  It’s not because I’m...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nickread.co.uk/notebook/2010/09/lost-soul/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Lost Soul'>Lost Soul</a> <small>I’m not sure she knows me now.  Most of the...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time flies, the old man cried, as the alarm clock struck him on the back of the head.  For the elderly, time does indeed fly; not just the clock but the days, the weeks, the years.  Time seems to shorten, to press in on itself, as we get older.</p>
<p>But for the young, a week can last forever.  Remember how we measured our age in fractions of years.  ‘I’m seven and a quarter’, I’d reply if asked.  And that 13 weeks I boarded at school felt like 13 years.  Mathematicians have suggested that our perception of time is relative to the duration of life.  A year is 10% of our life when we are 10, but only 1% when we are 100. </p>
<p>Personal time is perceived according to what new happens.  For children, the milestones are much closer. Their days are so packed with novelty, life is a constant stream of stimulation; their attention span so short that expectation seems endless.  As we get older, and accumulate responsibilities, the thrill of anticipation is replaced by the burden of obligation. There is little novelty, just more associations to work through, organise and file away. Too much to do; too little time!  With the end on the horizon, there is neither time nor inclination to look forward, so we tend to look back, reminisce, regret a bit and try to put it right. Events and thoughts collapse in on each other until time itself is confused. </p>
<p>Although our perception of time passing can alter through life, our body has a remarkable ability to mark time. It knows exactly when it’s time to go to sleep, time to eat and time to defaecate, and when we change time zones, it is some time before this body clock can be reset.  So.do we have some kind of accumulator in our brain that records the oscillations of temporal neurones, or the beats of the heart?  Probably not!  Nobody has identified a cerebral clock, but neuronal and hormonal activity is responsive to environmental cues or zietgebers like day/night cycle, day length and temperature.  So while real time is relatively static in our bodies, our perception of time is elastic.  When I am running, the same route goes much more rapidly if I am in a relaxed meditative state than if I aware of my performance, even though my pulse rate is much the same.  Time is like a river; the flow may be constant, but the calms, rapids and waterfalls of our thoughts can make seem to slow it down or speed it up.  </p>
<p>It has been suggested that our perception of time depends on our degree of arousal.    During extreme arousal, time slows down and intensity of experience is magnified, our memory expanded.  The more energy the brain spends in representing an event, the longer it lasts.  We can get more done in the morning when our level of arousal is at its optimum.</p>
<p>Think of how slowly time goes during a crisis. If we are going to crash, everything seems to go into slow motion. You have an argument with your lover and then part; you remember every word, every gesture, every look. Time dilates.  Psychologists call this amydala memory.  When the panic button is pressed, the brains cine film speeds up.  If you’re laying down a lot of memory, time goes by a lot more slowly, but does it just seem that way in retrospect because there’s more to play back? </p>
<p>Generally time passes much more slowly if you are waiting for something, but that too depends on your perspective. Take two men at a football match. The score is 1-0. There are ten minutes to go.  To the one whose team is ahead, that ten minutes is an eternity of dread, but to the others desperation to score accelerates the final whistle.</p>
<p>It would seem that our perception of time is an emotional quality.  Time is suspended when you are in the thrall of love, but if you know you must part, then it speeds up alarmingly.  Samuel Johnson said that there is nothing like a hanging to concentrate the mind, but he could have equally transposed ‘time’ for ‘mind’. </p>
<p>So is our perception of time a factor of the emotional energy of our thoughts.  The more energy we devote to things, the more we are conscious of time. Take boredom, for example, or depression.  Boredom is not passive or boring. Far from it, boredom is an active state of anticipation and frustration; an urgent need for something to happen, a  desire to kill time and attack your situation. Similarly most depression is a highly aroused state of anxiety and despair.  Driving my car down the motorway is the most boring thing I do. A journey to London is like a trip to the moon.  But if I listen to an audio-book at the same time, then I hardly notice it.  Children (of any age) who can lose themselves in creative play are rarely bored.  Boredom more usually applies to administrative tasks that I resent, like writing a grant application, filing a report or completing the tax return. Such a waste of time! But if I am preoccupied by some concern, that anything that takes me away from it, becomes boring. Perhaps time passes so slowly for the young because their lives are so occupied by the anxious frisson of change, that for nothing to happen is intolerable. .      </p>
<p>Time races by if we’re absorbed in a task.  It’s a form of meditation. I have spent two hours writing this article and yet it seems I have only just started. The same phenomenon occurs if we watch a good film or when we’re relaxed at a dinner party, talking to friends.  This acceleration of time is enhanced by alcohol and recreational drugs.  I can lose time having a good time. During therapy, the 50 minute hour goes very quickly when the client is engaged and relaxed, but if he’s defensive and resistant, it drags.  We can spend seven hours asleep completely unaware of time yet if anxiety keeps us awake all night,  the slow blind slither of night-time is exquisite torture.  </p>
<p>So how should we spend time?  Should we seek solace in creative activity and allow time to speed by unnoticed?  Or should we seek to extend it with stimulus and novelty in an accelerating desperation to avoid the end?   What is the bigger waste of time?</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nickread.co.uk/notebook/2009/12/time-and-tide/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Time and Tide'>Time and Tide</a> <small>Time is the measure of things moving.  It’s like history;...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nickread.co.uk/notebook/2010/04/too-tired-to-remember-easter/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Too tired to remember Easter.'>Too tired to remember Easter.</a> <small>Easter passed me by this year.  It’s not because I’m...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nickread.co.uk/notebook/2010/09/lost-soul/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Lost Soul'>Lost Soul</a> <small>I’m not sure she knows me now.  Most of the...</small></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nickread.co.uk/notebook/2009/12/tempus-fugit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
